18 May 2005

Conference Paper, Schmonference Paper

Having now finished two fabulous research stints at Colonial Williamsburg and the Virginia Historical Society, I am spending my last two weeks in Virginia engaged in solving small research problems at the Library of Virginia. I'm talking about those small, lingering problems that buzz around in your head at night and seem to have no resolution, such as: I've seen repeated references in secondary literature to Anthony and Isabella, clearly Africans, who lived with Captain William Tucker as either servants or slaves, and in 1624 had a son they named William who was baptized. Every secondary source, though, cites Alexander Brown's 1890 tome "The Genesis of the United States" on this. Brown, very unhelpfully, did not adhere to modern conventions of scholarly citation, and listed no primary source for this information. Clearly I want to see this primary source for myself, especially if it involves a baptized African-American child. About three hours of work yesterday, chasing up and down the reference shelves of the LVA, burrowing into the Swem index, I finally come up with the 1625 muster list, which is the source for information about little William's baptism. And, what about the marriage of Reverend John Bass to Elizabeth, daughter of the "Nansemond King" in 1638? Another mystery, which finally led me to a digital picture of a privately owned record alleging the information (privately owned by whom? good question) and a 1960s era genealogy which traced the descendants of this Anglo-Indian couple. I'm not sure if any of this information is useable...But I sure would like to be able to write about an Anglo-Indian marriage AFTER that of Pocahontas and John Rolfe.

So that's how I spend my mornings, chasing obscure references and often getting more confused in the process. Afternoons I spend finishing my paper for the Berks. My title is "'She defyled her body wth a Pagan': Religion and Interracial Intimacy in the Early Chesapeake." Yep, I get to talk for twenty minutes about religion, race, marriage, and, that great draw of academic audiences, FORNICATION. I gave a version of the paper in January at the AHA that went over well; now I find myself trying to revise that paper and say something of true significance that will also focus my argument for the dissertation chapter that examines these issues in greater depth.

It has caused me to wonder, why on earth do we have conferences? I have twenty minutes to talk. That's about ten pages of text. I can make just one argument in that amount of time, and that not in a very well-developed fashion. The issues are complicated, involving what made a body "Christian" and what it meant to "defyle" that body outside marriage, and why it was even more of a "defilement" to mix a Christian body with a heathen one. This touches on some delicate issues, and also requires a nuanced reading of the available source material. In twenty minutes and ten pages it will be difficult if not impossible for me to fully and convincingly make my case. I'll get some questions that ask me why I didn't talk about x, y, and z, and I'll have to say, yes, those are interesting ideas and I address them elsewhere. I will probably get one or two suggestions or questions that are genuinely helpful. And two days after my paper, I am sure no one in the audience will remember what I spoke about. Yet we're asked, in the name of professional development and scholarly exchange, to do this exercise on a regular basis. I have to ask, why?

Of course, I have no solutions to offer to this problem. A conference that allows longer papers and therefore longer sessions risks numb brains and numb behinds in the audience. I could just write it up and publish it somewhere, but to do so would be to add to the cacaphony already overrunning journals. So, my complaint is offered without solution. How can we do better at exchanging and critiqueing ideas?

Maybe I should just start posting conference papers to my blog...

6 Comments:

At Thursday, May 19, 2005 3:16:00 PM, Blogger academinist said...

I commented on this in my blog, briefly, but I have to say that I really love conferences. They keep me connected to the kind of scholarship going on beyond my own, remind me of the exciting parts of research and help me to meet new people. I especially enjoy conferences where papers are being presented outside my immediate discipline, because it helps me become more interdisciplinary and aware of scholarship trends. Plus...fun vacations with an excuse! :)

 
At Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:31:00 PM, Blogger Rebecca said...

Well, conferences are certainly better when someone else pays for 'em. (I have to pay for the Berks myself.) I like meeting people and going out for beer afterwards...will there be bloggers at the Berks? Should we all meet and drink tasty fermented beverages?

 
At Friday, May 20, 2005 10:16:00 AM, Blogger academinist said...

True (regarding the pay) but I'm a grad student, so while I get a little funding I pay for the majority myself. I have met some neat people at conferences, including a fellow blogger from Australia.

 
At Monday, May 23, 2005 12:18:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

you go to conferences to present your work, to present yourself, and to enter actively into the scholarly arena, by giving your work to your scholarly audience, thus legitimizing it. that is part of what it takes to get a good job. the second part is the scholarly networks that you develop at conferences, read Phil Agre's Networking on the Network, it is online, to see why that is important.

in fact, one could say that the networks are far more important than the scholarship, as long as the scholarship meets a minimum sense of quality for the audience. it is pretty clear to me that people without such networks, no matter how good they are, do not get good jobs.

 
At Monday, May 23, 2005 8:18:00 PM, Blogger Another Damned Medievalist said...

I am so jealous, and yet so thrilled! Rebecca is a lion! I know someone else who is presenting there. Session 59, if you're into women and commerce ...

 
At Saturday, May 28, 2005 7:31:00 AM, Blogger K said...

I am a grad student too, and I have found conferences very useful in ways I hadn't expected - presenters on subjects that are not really related to mine happen to mention a reference that discusses themes that overlap with my work - I've gained a few useful sources that way.
The annoying thing about conferences is the person who stands up after a presentation and says 'This isn't a question, more of a comment..." and launches into a 20 minute presentation of their own...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home